There's really no progress to report insofar as rental housing is concerned. The "chef" is definitely moving out in eleven days, or so he said. Only Alan and I have nowhere to go. The rental listings have been really sparse, too. Of course, there are numerous luxury rentals available. Who can afford to pay $4,000+ per month?
Well, when all else fails, there are always hottie pictures to fall back upon. Speaking of hotties, I am still experiencing intrusive thoughts about a certain fitness and training hottie. What's the point, though? Baby is never going to come around. Sheesh!
Last night, I spent about an hour or so with my new "smartphone." It is definitely a cheap device with a low resolution screen. However, the Web browser is far more capable than Safari on the iPad® tablet computer insofar as the "blog" is concerned. I am certain that I could perform all of the editing functions without any workarounds. The only drawback is the tiny four-inch screen and the equally tiny on-screen keyboard. I have to wonder whether I really need the iPad®.
By the way, I have not logged into any of the Google® surveillance "apps" with my one-and-only account on the "smartphone." Yet, I was shocked to see that both the "smartphone" and the iPad® devices were listed (along with an IP address and approximate location) in the Google® security logs. The "smartphone" was also designated as "synced," even though I have the option disabled. What are we to make of that?
Well, I have not much else to do except search for more hottie pictures. What do you think? Should there be more than three or four hottie pictures per day? I should also mention that I am currently not able to reply to comments in the "blog," at least while using the iPad®. The Safari browser locks itself in an endless loop of redirects. I wonder why that is ...
Three or four hottie pictures a day, while wonderful, is probably enough. You don't want us all to get distracted, do you?
ReplyDelete